Given my frequent engagement with the concept of codependency, it is imperative for me to delve into the theoretical underpinnings of child development. Undeniably, the manner in which we mature, the environment in which our growth takes place, and the individuals with whom we share our formative years constitute crucial factors in the emergence of codependency as a behavioral issue. Notably, the individuals with whom we spend our early years likely exert the most significant influence among the aforementioned elements.

During childhood, we find ourselves in a state of dependency, unable to extricate ourselves from our familial surroundings. Consequently, we develop coping mechanisms and survival strategies. A compassionate perspective regards codependent characteristics as adaptive responses to the circumstances faced during childhood. While such traits may have been beneficial during our formative years, as adults who possess a clearer understanding of the origins of our codependency, we have the opportunity to choose an alternate path. It is important to note that a child’s parents’ inability to fulfill all of their needs does not render the child inherently flawed. However, it does imply that the individual may carry into adulthood a persistent pursuit of self-worth through engagement in various activities. This exemplifies codependency.

Accepting the notion that our parents may have failed us in some capacity can be challenging. When confronted with this idea, we often rationalize their actions by asserting that they did their best given the resources available to them. These techniques were typically learned from their own upbringing and the parenting style to which they were exposed during their own childhood. Parenting tends to be a generational trait, as parents often emulate the same approach with which they were raised due to its status as the sole model available to them. Consequently, they lack the knowledge necessary to parent effectively. Although this may serve as an explanation for suboptimal parenting, it is the child who suffers the consequences. Every parent inevitably makes mistakes, but the significance of these errors can vary.

Justifying parental dysfunction is a complex and nuanced topic that requires careful consideration. While it is possible to understand the underlying factors that contribute to parental dysfunction, it is essential to emphasize that justification should not be confused with excusing or condoning harmful behavior. Instead, the goal is to gain insight into the potential causes and circumstances that may have influenced parental dysfunction.

  1. Personal history and upbringing: Parents are individuals shaped by their own life experiences, including their upbringing, relationships, and socio-cultural context. Understanding the challenges and traumas they may have faced can shed light on the origins of their dysfunction. For example, parents who have experienced abuse, neglect, or substance abuse themselves may struggle with parenting skills and exhibit dysfunctional behaviors.
  2. Mental health issues: Undiagnosed or untreated mental health conditions can significantly impact a parent’s ability to provide a stable and nurturing environment. Conditions such as depression, anxiety, personality disorders, or addiction can contribute to dysfunctional behavior patterns that affect parenting.
  3. Interpersonal dynamics and relationships: Parental dysfunction can be influenced by the dynamics within the family unit. For instance, a strained marital relationship, conflicts between parents, or extended family issues can exacerbate dysfunction and create an unhealthy environment for children.
  4. Societal and environmental factors: External factors such as poverty, unemployment, societal pressures, or cultural norms can contribute to parental dysfunction. Economic stressors, limited access to resources or support systems, and societal expectations can add additional challenges to parenting and contribute to dysfunction.

While understanding these factors can provide insight into parental dysfunction, it is important to note that justification should never minimize or dismiss the impact of harmful behavior on the well-being of children. Recognizing the underlying causes of dysfunction does not absolve parents of their responsibility to provide a safe and healthy environment for their children.

It is crucial to prioritize the well-being and safety of children in cases of severe dysfunction or abuse. Seeking professional help, such as therapy or counseling, can be valuable for both the parents and the affected children to address and work through the consequences of parental dysfunction.

In summary, justifying parental dysfunction involves understanding the potential factors that contribute to it, such as personal history, mental health issues, interpersonal dynamics, and societal factors. However, it is important to maintain a balanced perspective that acknowledges the impact of dysfunction while striving for empathy and understanding.

What is frequently overlooked is the profound sensitivity of children to their surrounding environment—an atmosphere cultivated by parents and further shaped by the approach to parenting. Children carry with them into adulthood any issues they encountered within such homes. From a minor phrase of criticism to a lack of attention and supervision, or even to overt neglect and abuse, all these experiences exert a profound influence on a child’s perception of the world and, more crucially, their perception of self.

Another consideration pertains to the inherent perspective that children hold toward their parents. During early childhood, children lack the cognitive abilities necessary to evaluate whether their parents are adept or deficient in their parenting skills. The process of comparison only begins much later, when children start identifying more closely with their peers and become aware of disparities in the treatment they receive from their parents compared to that of their friends. Prior to this point, children often possess a near-“god-like” perception of their parents, even if parenthood entails considerable stress and strain. They find it inconceivable that these “gods” could utter or engage in anything deemed offensive, inappropriate, or abusive. They firmly believe that their parents’ words and actions are justifiable simply because they originated from them. As children, we all experienced this sense that our parents knew what they were doing, only to realize later that they were fallible. The level of responsibility associated with becoming a parent cannot be overstated. While it is certain that everyone will make mistakes, obtaining a fundamental understanding of child development and the consequences of inadequate parenting proves beneficial.

Children internalize the belief that they are responsible for any actions or words directed at them as a result of the aforementioned dynamics. This belief leads them to conclude that “perfect” individuals have the right to mistreat, abuse, ignore, or neglect them because they themselves are inherently flawed. This philosophy is carried into adulthood, permeating subsequent relationships. Individuals undergoing therapy may argue that they “deserved” such treatment, that their parents were merely “disciplining” them, or that their parents “did their best.” These assertions serve as attempts to rationalize their parents’ abusive behaviors, perpetuating the image of “god-like” parents who possess flawless attributes.

Consider a scenario in which an individual, having grown from a child into an adult, enters a relationship burdened with the belief that they are inherently “bad” or “wrong.” Even in the most favorable circumstances, when children perceive a threat to their well-being, they exhibit primal behaviors and defensive mechanisms. These circumstances become significantly more distressing in cases involving neglect and abuse. Regardless of the severity of the situation, children exert every effort to earn their parents’ approval and love or, alternatively, withdraw completely. These mechanisms eventually manifest as the thought patterns and behaviors we exhibit as adults, commonly referred to as “Thinking Parts.” In adult relationships, conflicts often transport us back to earlier experiences through triggers, leading us to behave in ways reminiscent of the past.

Disentangling oneself from dysfunctional patterns ingrained in the past is a complex process, often manifesting as ingrained routine behaviors and reflexes that elicit subsequent regret. Complicating matters further, parents frequently deny or defend their involvement when questioned, thereby shifting blame back onto the child in question. Nonetheless, once awareness is attained, effective measures can be implemented to facilitate the healing process

Subscribe to Dr Jenner's Blog via Email

Dr Jenner creates a wealth of resources, articles and podcasts. Please subscribe to be notified.

Please Contribute